Legislature(2011 - 2012)BARNES 124
04/11/2012 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
SB119 | |
HB259 | |
HB266 | |
SB27 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | SB 119 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 259 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 266 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | SB 27 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 259-PHARMACY AUDITS 3:59:35 PM CHAIR OLSON announced that the next order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 259, "An Act establishing procedures and guidelines for auditing pharmacy records; and providing for an effective date." CHAIR OLSON removed his objection to the adoption of CSHB 259, Version E, labeled 27LS0675\E, Martin, 4/9/12, which was left pending at the April 9, 2012 meeting. There being no further objection, Version E was before the committee. 4:00:10 PM CHRISTOPHER CLARK, Staff, Representative Cathy Munoz, Alaska State Legislature, commended the committee's staff, Konrad Jackson, for his work on this bill. He referred to page 2, line 6-10 to the language changes related to Scriveners' errors or written errors. He explained that audits would not be conducted within 90 days after an audit in which no errors were found. The definition of error was inserted. He referred to page 2, lines 31 through page 3, line 4, which relates to clerical error. He referred to page 3, lines 27-30, which indicates this section does not apply to a criminal investigation or investigation or audit by a governmental agency, including state Medicaid programs. He said the sponsor hopes this will lead to a zero fiscal note. He referred to page 2, lines 28-30, which adds language to deal with the mail orders, such that an auditor may not assess a charge-back, recoupment or other penalty against a pharmacy based solely on the mailed prescription or delivered at the request of the patient as part of a routine business practice of a pharmacy. He related his understanding that the pharmacists will echo the sponsor's sentiments on the work that has been done. 4:02:22 PM BARRY CHRISTENSEN, Pharmacist, Island Pharmacy, Inc.; Co-Chair, Legislative Committee, Alaska Pharmacists Association (AkPhA), said he concurs with Mr. Clark and appreciates the work done on the bill. He offered his belief that the bill is a good compromise and contains language that will help pharmacists stay focused on their main tasks on not fret about the issues related to audits. He acknowledged that Version E does not contain everything the pharmacists sought, but reiterated that Version E is a good compromise. He concluded that he appreciates the committee's work. CHAIR OLSON particularly commended the efforts of his aide, Konrad Jackson, and the sponsor's staff, Christopher Clark. 4:03:31 PM REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON asked whether he is sure the pharmacists do not want the auditors to use extrapolation. He said it seems to him that the pharmacists will just be subject to more and more audits without extrapolation being used. He predicted that the pharmacists are not going to like this. DR. CHRISTENSEN said, "Yes we are." He elaborated that most of the pharmacists believe that they do an incredible job scrutinizing prescriptions and do their best. The auditors lead them to believe by virtue of extrapolation that they make lots of errors; however, the pharmacists disagree and would rather be judged on what they do and not on what they might have done, which is extrapolation. He pointed out that most other states that have passed similar legislation regarding extrapolation, agree with the pharmacists, but he appreciated Representative Johnson's concerns. REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON reiterated that not allowing extrapolation will increase the number of audits. He characterized the tradeoff as deciding between more audits or extrapolating the fines and fees. 4:05:11 PM TOM HODEL, Pharmacist and Owner, Soldotna Professional Pharmacy, stated he is in his 28th year of business and is celebrating the pharmacy's anniversary this week. He said he concurs with Mr. Christensen that pharmacists do not like extrapolation. He disagreed that the bill would lead to more audits. He reiterated his earlier testimony, such that his pharmacy underwent an audit in which the auditor used extrapolation. He said he did not think it was very fair so hired a lawyer and fought it. He ended up reaching a compromise. He highlighted that auditors questioned 4 of 100 claims, of which 3 were clerical errors. The audit resulted in one $48 claim and by using extrapolation resulted in an attempt to charge them over $7,500. He finally settled for $4,000, after two appeals. He said, "I certainly do not like extrapolation process." [HB 259 was held over.]